A community for online education enthusiasts
Replied Nov. 30, 2007
Started this discussion. Last reply by Terence Armentano Nov. 30, 2007.
Replied Aug. 29, 2007
Posted on May 27th, 2008 at 12:29pm —
No Comments (Add)
Posted on August 29th, 2007 at 10:46am —
No Comments (Add)
…
Continue
Posted on July 30th, 2007 at 11:02am —
No Comments (Add)
Posted on June 4th, 2007 at 9:58am —
No Comments (Add)
Terence Armentano
created this social network on Ning.
Spread the word. Get your own Online Teaching badge for your website or MySpace page. (Get Code)
© 2008 Created by Terence Armentano on Ning. Create your own social network
Comment Wall (21 comments)
You need to be a member of Online Teaching to add comments!
Join this network
I started live and started smallo to develop a reputation. Then I had a little foloowing among home schooers and I took it online. You can start small online though.
Wiziq can help facilitate that.
I've set up an installation - initially using Drigg, and now using the custom platform used on my sandbox.similibus.org site - that automatically imports rss feeds from relevant news sources (I'm teaching at a medical school, so am using the Health news feeds from BBC news and National Public Radio; Terri Gross's Fresh Air interviews; and some feeds from the CDC). This imports all items in these news feeds as individual drupal "nodes".
News items show up then as node items, each with a voting form permitting each user the option of one "up" vote; with a form allowing community tagging of the content; and with treaded commenting enabled. Raw news items can be viewed as a "river of news" (all items, most recent on top), or as a table.
A variety of views are available - including cloud views of item titles - with promotion of items based on user ratings, comment density, and/or user-created tags. The interface using Pligg or Drigg would be simpler, but quite workable (I do love those cloud view pages - being a dominantly visual learner).
This permits our user community to "float" selected stories judged relevant to our community discussion, into the forefront for continued discussion.
This is one "corner" of my social learning platform (the remainder being based on user-generated content). My sense is that a Pligg/Drigg-like platform will handle this 3rd-party content well, but other approaches might be best for user-generated content.
So far, I only have experiments with a small number of selected users (some cybersavvy folks who could weather the early glitches in the system). Will go live in one week, I'll post my success and failure stories here.
As things look now -
If you need a good social ratings site directly out of the box, which accepts distributed content submitted as individual items (and can accept feeds submitted by those with admins privileges), Pligg is a great platform. Very simple user interface. The provided "pligg this" link makes it easy to directly submit items while browsing. Sets up out of the box easily. Haven't played around with themes yet, there are a few simple ones available & the default one is simple & elegant.
Drigg provides almost equivalent features, within a Drupal installation. Requires a bit more attention in setup (tho not daunting by any means). This would be my recommendation if one needed to integrate Digg-like features into an existing Drupal installation, or needed to build other features into a site (such as direct blogging in addition to displaying imported distributed content, &c.). This module suite is developing rapidly, so I'd keep an eye on it, it is only likely to get much better over time.
I'm very fond of the custom platform I've developed in Drupal (at http://sandbox.similibus.org). Drupal's Views plugin permits all sorts of creative page views, and in conjunction with the NodeCloud module permits awesome content cloud pages. If folks wish to clone this, the site is documented on my blog at http://wt.similibus.org.
One advantage of a custom platform, is that it permits one to play with alternate algorithms for social promotion of submitted items, not being locked into a ratings formula. I remain a bit perplexed about the most pedagogically sound approach to promoting peer-submitted content in a community blog or in an aggregation of peer-created distributed content. Clearly user rating (voting up) works nicely for user-submitted 3rd party content (as in Digg), or for items from an imported 3rd-party feed (such as a relevant news feed). I'm concerned tho, with the pedagogical implications of user rating of peer-submitted content. I've currently configured my installation to promote items based on comment density - how much discussion did an item provoke. I'd really like to see some discussion on this point, and perhaps some other proposals re alternative algorithms for promotion of content-items on a community site.
I've put the sandbox site (link above) up for others to play around in, add content &c., hoping that this might attract some discussion that could serve the further evolution of such installations. Please mess around in it & give me some ideas.
Becky and I team teach a pilot project(f2f) for OHVA, once a week to students in grades 2-6. Along with my master's in professional development from UW-Stout, I am working toward a certificate of elearning from the same school. I am interested in what you have to share.
I would have taken your course, but we just started back up and I feel a bit swamped right now.
I am mary.hricko (how boring) on Skype. I don't know where they we put me in Moulton, but I will get back with you so we can do a test with Skype. What learning communities are you in for OLN? Should we start a social networking LC?
I might be going to Madison as well. I'll write more about the Kent presentation to you later.
Terence
View All Comments